ANALISIS KONTEN KOMUNITAS BELAJAR PROFESIONAL PENDIDIK (PLC) DENGAN MODE VIRTUAL DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN KOMPETENSI PENDIDIK

Kadek Wiramarta

Sari


Abstract

 

The viability of a PLC is contingent upon the active engagement of its members, which is fostered through interactions inside the PLC. An important component that is taken into consideration is the substance of the PLC that is discussed by the participants themselves. Therefore, this research will analyse the conversation issues that arose in two PLCs which were chosen because of the activeness of the participants. This research will utilise Critical Discourse Analysis to identify the themes that arose in the PLC between August and November 2023. According to the study, there are four prominent issues frequently mentioned in the PLCs which can be detailed as follows: (1) Cultivating positive classroom dynamics, (2) Advancing professional growth for educators, (3) Addressing internal challenges faced by learners, and (4) Exchanging insights on educational administration. This research aims to elucidate the requirements of educators in order to encourage their active involvement in PLC. Further elaboration on the implications of the research will also be provided.

Keywords : Content, Critical Discourse Analysis, PLC


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Alam, P. (2016). Teachers’engagement in social support process on a networking site. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 1(1), 34-45.

Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In K.G. Smith & M.A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9–35). Oxford University Press.

Brennan, A., & Gorman, A. (2023). Leading transformative profesional learning for inclusion across the teacher education continuum: lessons from online and on-site learning communities. Profesional Development in Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2238717

Christensen, P. H. (2007). Knowledge sharing: moving away from the obsession with best practices. Journal of knowledge management, 11(1), 36-47. doi:10.1108/13673270710728222

de Boer, H., Fahrenwald, C., & Spies, A. (2018, January). Profesionalization in Teacher education as an interorganizational learning challenge. dalam Frontiers in Education (Vol. 3, p. 4). Frontiers Media SA.

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ profesional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X0833114

Desimone, L. M. (2011). A primer on effective profesional development. Phi delta kappan, 92(6), 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200616

DuFour, R., & DuFour, R. (2013). Learning by doing: A handbook for profesional learning communities at work TM. Solution Tree Press.

Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Classroom management as a field of inquiry. Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues, 3(1), 16.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

Goodyeara, V. A., Caseybc, A., & Parkerc, M. (2015). “Must share without fear of being judged”: SNSs capacity to form engaging and impactful profesional learning communities. Dalam sebuah presentasi ilmiah yang dilakukan di the European Educational Research Association Conference (Vol. 8, p. 11th).

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Related to Achievement. Routledge

Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective profesional development: A new consensus. Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, 127, 150.

Johnson, Z. D., & LaBelle, S. (2017). An examination of teacher authenticity in the college classroom. Communication Education, 66(4), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2017.1324167

Keller-Schneider, M., Zhong, H. F., & Yeung, A. S. (2020). Competence and challenge in profesional development: teacher perceptions at different stages of career. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(1), 36-54.

Kim, D. (2008). The development process of network-based community of practice for teachers’ knowledge sharing and expertise development. The Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 1 –30.

Klein, A. Z., Junior, J. C. D. S. F., Barbosa, J. L. V., & Baldasso, L. (2018). The educational affordances of mobile instant messaging (MIM): Results of Whatsapp® used in higher education. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 16(2), 51-64.

Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Routledge.

Kulinna, P. H. (2007). Teachers' attributions and strategies for student misbehavior. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 21-30.

Lewis, R. (1999). Teachers coping with the stress of classroom discipline. Social psychology of education, 3(3), 155-171.

Lodders, N., & Meijers, F. (2017). Collective learning, transformational leadership and new forms of careers guidance in universities. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 45(5), 532-546. doi:10.1080/03069885.2016.1271864.

Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Profesional communities and student achievement–a meta-analysis. School effectiveness and school improvement, 22(2), 121-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.550467

Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ profesional community in restructuring schools. American educational research journal, 33(4), 757-798. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033004757

Matejka, K., & Kurke, L. (1994). Designing a great syllabus. College Teaching, 42(3), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1994.9926838

McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2010). Profesional learning communities: Building blocks for school culture and student learning. Voices in Urban Education, 27(1), 35-45.

Moll, L. C. (1992). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A sociocultural approach. In R. Beach, J. L. Green, M. L. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives in literacy research (pp. 211–244). National Conference on Research in English and National Council of Teachers of English.

Nitza, D., & Roman, Y. (2016). WhatsApp Messaging: Achievements and Success in Academia. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), 255-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n4p255

OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 87–122). London, UK: Sage.

Rogers, R., & Mosley, M. (2008). A critical discourse analysis of racial literacy in teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 19(2), 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.02.002

Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International journal of educational research, 39(1-2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2

Rutherford, C. (2010). Facebook as a source of informal teacher profesional development. In education, 16 (1), 60-74.

Seo, K (2014). Profesional learning of observers, collaborators, and contributors in a teacher-created online community in Korea. Asia Pacific journal of education, 34(3), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.860004

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Profesional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of educational change, 7(4), 221-258.

Tam, A. C. F. (2015). The role of a profesional learning community in teacher change: A perspective from beliefs and practices. Teachers and Teaching, 21(1), 22-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928122

van Driel, J., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2000). Profesional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137 – 158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U


Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.